In a new article on [365 Gay] I learned that apparently meddling in other countries affairs is not only a Bush/Rove issue. It appears that American conservatives and evangelical Christians feel that they have the rights (or duty) to meddle wherever they feel, be it another state or another country.
I wonder how outraged they would feel if Canadians suddenly started lobbying our representatives for gay marriage? Outraged I’m sure, yet they are doing exactly this. It fascinates me that they can be such hypocrites and not even know it. How do they fool themselves into living a double standard while not even noticing it?
Perhaps the answer lies in the fact that they have been deceived their whole lives and just accept fiction as fact if it must be taken on “faith”. Let me illustrate, your grandmother tells you that she sat down with the late Princess Dianna of Whales yesterday for tea and had a wonderful chat. Is she Crazy or does she have Dementia? Perhaps, but Dr. James Dobson tells you that he spoke to Jesus and was told that the whole gay marriage issue is bad and will lead to the end of the world. Is he Crazy or does he have Dementia? Probably, unless you have faith and believe.
There seems to be this huge double standard. Things which are not logically explainable or something which can be verified using the scientific method are valid and real if they are religious and you as a believer must take them on faith. Additionally, it does not matter what non-believers believe as they will be burning in hell soon. So save as many souls as you can so that you can get into Heaven by proselytizing to them and converting them to your religious beliefs without regard for their own beliefs.
Oh and of course PRAISE JESUS!
Can I say fabulously funny? I was quite shocked when just days after my first blog entry I noticed that one of my postings had a comment on it.
I instantly accessed the comment to get this juicy results and was a little confused by the brief comment so I decided to see who was commenting on my blog.
After deducing that the comment was regarding my subject matter and not my audacity to attempt a blog unaided on my own, I read a little further and discovered this wonderful entry.
The American mystery deepens: Tylenol PM is Evil
We have all been there at one time and I found the whole story decidedly hilarious and most entertaining. In crude terms "I busted out laughing".
Love it, Love it, Love it !!
Following the recent outing of Sponge Bob Square Pants by James Dobson, the Traditional Values Coalition has announced that the upcoming DVD release of Shrek 2 contains many "subtle sexual messages".
Such messages include:
"The movie features a male-to-female transgender (in transition) as an evil
bartender. The character has five o'clock shadow, wears a dress and has female
breasts. It is clear that he is a she-male."
and
"An earlier scene in the movie features a wolf dressed in grandma's clothing and
reading a book when Prince Charming encounters him. Later, one of the characters
refers to the wolf's gender confusion. "
It seems quite silly to any person of reason, but apparently the supporters of this and other similar organizations are to stupid to see the absurdity of all this. I still find myself wondering at night, do they actually believe this crap?
What crap? You might ask. We simply that the Gay Community as a whole or in part has the power to influence a Hollywood studio to incorporate subtle "gay agenda" items into a movie simply to advance that whole "Gay Agenda".
What do you think?
A US Citizen has been charged in alleged plot to assassinate Bush. A former Virginia high school valedictorian who had been detained in Saudi Arabia as a suspected terrorist was charged Tuesday with conspiring to assassinate President Bush and with supporting the al-Qaida terrorist network.
http://g.msn.com/0MNBUS00/2?http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/7012172&&CM=EmailThis&CE=1I would love to comment on this story, however I'm sure that Homeland Security would waste precious resources and manpower investigating me needlessly to the detriment of our nations safety.
Finally after bloggers left and right have been pushing this very important story that the White House very much wants to distance itself from, the mainstream media has begun to touch it with a ten-foot pole.
The New York Times : The White House Stages Its 'Daily Show'Christian Science Monitor : Bush administration blurs media boundarySalon.com : Midnight cowboy in the garden of Bush and evilIt amazes me that there are so many American's oblivious to this administration's tactics and those of chief advisor Carl Rove. Carl Rove has been using the same tactics to benefit his party at the expense of the truth since his days in Texas.
Why then should the media and the public at large not get upset and REALLY demand answers when a gay, conservative, hooker who has no formal journalism education background or affiliation with any reputable media outlet is allowed unfettered access to the White House briefing room?
Let's break it down so that those among us who lack the ability to think for themselves (you know who you are - W 04) may get a clue.
Irrelevant Points:
- Subject is gay.
- Subject is a hooker.
Relevant Points:
- Subject used an alias (pretended to be someone else) and apparently thwarted the hightened post 9/11 security measures put in place to protect the President and the White House every day for two years.
- Subject has not formal journalism training.
- Subject is a conservative working for a conservative propaganda machine (Talon News) masquerading as a news organization.
- Talon News has ties directly to the RNC and will often regurgitate it's talking points as news.
- Subject was able to obtain a daily pass to the White House briefing room everyday for two years while never obtaining any access to congress because he could not pass their screening process.
- The White House Spokes Person almost always called on him to deflect more important questions.
This now makes 5 individuals that this administration has paid or been linked to who claim to be performing unbiased journalism while actually spreading domestic propaganda illegally.
Corrupt Journalists So Far:
- Armstrong Williams
- Karen Ryan
- Alberto Garcia
- Maggie Gallagher
- Jeff Gannon / Jim Guckert
Domestic propaganda it illegal, so who will pay the price? No one unless the public demands someone's head. This is unlikely since a majority of the selfish, self-absorbed Americans are all ignorantly wrapped up in their own lives. If they didn't care when the President admitted to lying about weapons in Iraq as a reason for going to war, then what is a little domestic propaganda and continued lying?
FYI - This is the exact language in the law which governs dissemination of information within the United States:
"The Secretary is authorized, when he finds it appropriate, to provide for the preparation, and dissemination abroad, of information about the United States, its people, and its policies, through press, publications, radio, motion pictures, and other information media, and through information centers and instructors abroad. Subject to subsection (b) of this section, any such information (other than ''Problems of Communism'' and the ''English Teaching Forum'' which may be sold by the Government Printing Office) shall not be disseminated within the United States, its territories, or possessions, but, on request, shall be available in the English language at the Department of State, at all reasonable times following its release as information abroad, for examination only by representatives of United States press associations, newspapers, magazines, radio systems, and stations, and by research students and scholars, and, on request, shall be made available for examination only to Members of Congress. (b) Dissemination of information within United States
(1) The Director of the United States Information Agency shall make available to the Archivist of the United States, for domestic distribution, motion pictures, films, videotapes, and other material prepared for dissemination abroad 12 years after the initial dissemination of the material abroad or, in the case of such material not disseminated abroad, 12 years after the preparation of the material."
The reference in the United States Code is:
Title 22 Foreign Relations and Intercourse
Chapter 18 United States Information and Educational Exchange Programs
Subchapter 5 Dissemination Abroad of Information About The United States
Section 1461 General Authorization
New to Blogging, not to the web!
I recently reformatted my personal website and decided to give blogging a try. For me writing in a journal was always a problem. My handwriting is absolutely pathetic, I would come back and find that I was unable to read my own journal. I also seem to easily loose track of my possessions, including my journals. I do not know where my many journals have disappeared to.
To that end, let's see how long I can keep this online journal going, and what springs from it very lines of word and code.
